Close Reading November 20

How about better parents?
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/20/opinion/sunday/friedman-how-about-better-parents.html?scp=2&sq=november%2020%20opinion%20article&st=Search

In this article, a response to the recent debate about our education system and funding, the author makes the case that what is really needed is more parental involvement.

On a first read, the language and tone of the author is at first hard to distinguish. By the title, we know exactly what the author's ideas are, but as there seems to be nary a sentence without a quote. This projects others' voices into the article. However, we get to hear the author's voice by the quote selection and manipulation. The quote fanaticism projects an air of desiring to seem well informed and confidence inspiring. After all, how can you not trust quotes from studies and scientists? When not quoting, the author uses a semi-formal tone, creating a sense of reliability and familiarity.

Although the author does not  include much slang, the diction is not particularly note-worthy. Neither poet-laureate nor trailer park, it gives the reader something of a non-impression, removing most traces of a persona.

The syntax of this piece gradually diminishes in complexity. The sentences in the last paragraph are short, repetitive, and begin with conjunctions. Although some writers might use this to emphasize a point, as the author is merely restating an opinion (or the title) it creates an impression that the author ran out of steam and slapped on an ending. The syntax is largely repetitive: brief sentence, sentence with quote. This creates a feeling that the whole article would work better as bullet points and listed information. The author has merely compiled information instead of making conclusions and explaining it.

Nov 20 Response to Class material

Death of a Salesman. Hrm. I liked the points, but frankly was glad to have finished it. It created a complicated emotion, part pity, part extreme distaste. Willy is pitiful, but still majorly messed up his sons. It's hard to reconcile these emotions. I think I feel worst for Happy. He was always overshadowed by Biff, yet most believes in his father's legacy.

Our essays were a tad... rough. The highest score we had in our group was a 5. It's so hard to remember to hit all the points of the essay while being insightful AND original. Stupid 9. Oh well, onward we shall go!

Open Prompt 5

1974. Choose a work of literature written before 1900. Write an essay in which you present arguments for and against the work's relevance for a person in 1974. Your own position should emerge in the course of your essay. You may refer to works of literature written after 1900 for the purpose of contrast or comparison. Much Ado about Nothing

             In a society that is obsessed with the new, it’s easy to imagine that past works have little relevance today. This is an untrue assessment based on the continued applicability of Shakespeare’s Much Ado About Nothing. The exploration of gender relations and problems of courtship gives it lasting appeal. However, modern readers’ unfamiliarity of Shakespeare’s poetic techniques and language often provide an impediment to its accessibility.

         The battle of the sexes forms a large part of the dialogue of Much Ado About Nothing. The “merry war” between Beatrice and Benedick provides an ongoing commentary on which gender is capable of enduring love, and their doubts that either can commit. Through their witty arguments they spurn each other’s respective gender for what they perceive as intrinsic flaws, uttering disparagements very familiar to modern readers. Fidelity is a main plot point in this work. Hero’s supposed affair reveals an enormous double standard for sexual morality. Although most fathers today would not threaten to kill their daughters, there is still a different stigma attached to female sexual behavior outside marriage than to male “exploits”.

         The hazards of courtship drive the adventures and misadventures of the characters. The leap of faith needed to trust is a recurring theme for both the male and female characters. Benedick disparages love because he feels he cannot trust women while the often repeated song decries men as “deceivers ever”. Fear of rejection paralyzes both sets of lovers. Don Pedro woos Hero in place of Claudio and neither Benedick nor Beatrice are willing to pursue the other until they are convinced they will not be spurned. With these common dilemmas Shakespeare creates characters we identify with to this day.

         Shakespeare’s poetic conventions and use of early modern English can serve to distance the modern reader. The use of iambic pentameter is now an uncommon convention and can make the dialogue seem unnatural and forced to modern ears. Words in Early Modern English had slightly different sounds and thus created rhymes that no longer translate well. Many of his puns and humor derive themselves from idioms no longer in use.

         Despite the setback of outmoded language devices, Much Ado About Nothing remains relevant to today’s reader. The trials of love remain constant, human nature has changed little in the past four-hundred years. We are still plagued by insecurities, jealousies, and desire literature to help us sigh no more after the misadventures of the heart.